summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/funcs/popd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHarald van Dijk <harald@gigawatt.nl>2017-06-30 01:33:29 +0200
committerHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>2018-03-10 16:01:43 +0800
commit7f31919cba4b17af883db77f99bfa974f0821361 (patch)
tree363de67b2d4b3b6042626651529eb5a5b2b2a70f /src/funcs/popd
parentman: Small cleanup for Command Line Editing (diff)
downloaddash-7f31919cba4b17af883db77f99bfa974f0821361.tar.gz
dash-7f31919cba4b17af883db77f99bfa974f0821361.zip
input: Fix here-document redirection with vi/emacs on
On 27/06/17 16:29, Zando Fardones wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I've found a bug when using the here-document redirection in
> an interactive shell. What basically happens is that you can't see the
> command output if you set the "vi" or "emacs" options.

That's not quite what happens: the here-document contents got lost, so
there is no command output to see. Nice find.

The problem is that getprompt() is implicitly called by el_gets(). This
messes with the memory used by the parser to store the here-document's
contents. In the non-emacs/vi case, the prompt is explicitly written by
setprompt(), which wraps the getprompt() call in a
pushstackmark()/popstackmark() pair to restore the state so that parsing
can continue. But when getprompt() is called by el_gets(), it knows
nothing about this.

The whole call to el_gets() can be surrounded by another
pushstackmark()/popstackmark() pair to solve the problem, as attached.

Cheers,
Harald van Dijk

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Diffstat (limited to '')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions