| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It should indicate the position after having seen the tagged message.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
"Tag skip" like it's a speedrun :3
|
|
|
|
| |
I think for some caps we need to filter messages without origins.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Filter functions are dealing with lines not including CRLF, so they
already have extra space. serverFormat is using snprintf which wants to
always write a NUL at the end of the string.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a line was produced by another client, it won't have one from the
server.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't yet, but it will break the "robustness principle" according
to which a server "SHOULD NOT" assume that a client capable of parsing
one tag is capable of parsing all tags. In future, TagCaps will have all
other caps that use tags ORed into it, and only if the client supports
none of them will tags be filtered out.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I still think this limit is unreasonably large in comparison to 512 for
the actual message.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If there's no room left in the buffer, tls_read will return 0 (since we
gave it zero length to read into) and cause client->error to be set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a little bit messy. Allows setting either -A or -W or both.
Implements SASL EXTERNAL for clients that expect that when connecting
with a client certificate.
Need to test that reloading still works inside capsicum, since I suspect
that rewind call may be blocked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way things like litterbox can do it automatically without having to
be configured with a hyphen-prefixed username, which is usually invalid
anywhere else.
|
|
|
|
| |
Oops! Clients could get pounce to quit if they didn't send a message.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise, the result of strncmp gets converted size_t, since size_t
has greater rank than int.
Since wordcmp is only ever used as a boolean condition, this poses
no real issue, but presumably, it is meant to behave like the other
*cmp function and return a value less than, equal to, or greater
than 0 depending on the result of the comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise, each source file that includes the header gets its own
definition, and according to the C standard (C99 6.9p5):
> If an identifier declared with external linkage is used in an
> expression (other than as part of the operand of a sizeof operator
> whose result is an integer constant), somewhere in the entire
> program there shall be exactly one external definition for the
> identifier
Most compilers use the .bss section for zero data, but if it uses
.data instead, or if -Wl,--warn-common is used, this will cause a
linking error.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't know what I was thinking. I'm expecting a number less than 1000
of course that fits in int.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I think it's fine to keep it separate since it's a core function of the
bouncer.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Channel names can contain '!' so splitting the whole message on it won't
work.
I hate this code though.
|
|
|
|
| |
I really want to be writing tests for these functions...
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The list that I've defined are the ones that I expect to be able to
enable probably without any clients breaking... And of course
server-time which pounce implements itself.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Turns out I did eventually fix this, because I may want to implement
"passive clients" for logging or notification stuff, which wouldn't
affect AWAY status either.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GCC hates declaring static consts in headers and not using them, for
some stupid reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the
> Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users
> interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version
> supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding
> Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source
> from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary
> means of facilitating copying of software.
This potentially means that every freenode user, for example, is
interacting with this software, and offering the corresponding source to
each of them is an unreasonable burden.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|