| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://defs.ircdocs.horse/info/selfmessages.html
This fixes private message routing in Textual, as it only has correct
behaviour if it sees this CAP.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Doesn't need any new filtering since the actual messages added by
extended-monitor are gated by other caps which already have filtering.
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes allowing empty lines from clients during registration.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Finally something more reasonable for call sites.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Bumped on both send and receive.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So that it can actually be logged to a file separate from any errors
or status messages. Also make sure only LF is used when logging.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Setting an AWAY message then disconnecting will no longer replace
the AWAY message with the default one. Reconnecting continues to
always clear AWAY.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Based on seprint(2) from Plan 9. I'm not sure if my return value
exactly matches Plan 9's in the case of truncation. seprint(2) is
described only as returning a pointer to the terminating '\0', but
if it does so even in the case of truncation, it is awkward for the
caller to detect. This implementation returns end in the truncation
case, so that (ptr == end) indicates truncation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only request it with labeled-response, since it is impossible to
correlate messages to clients without. For clients without echo-message,
synthesize a label on PRIVMSG/NOTICE/TAGMSG, then filter out received
messages with that label.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't think this is worth adding a configuration option for since real
clients will definitely accomplish registration faster than 10s and it's
long enough to even type out manually for testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Except for during writes. This prevents pounce getting blocked on a
client sending only a partial TLS record, for example.
Writes still need to block because pounce doesn't have a way to resume
them. (And it would do so by having a buffer, but sockets already have a
send buffer, so what would be the point of that?) I don't think it
should be a problem since outside of stateSync, writes only happen when
poll returns POLLOUT. I feel like ideally SO_SNDLOWAT would be set to
guarantee a full IRC message can always be written on POLLOUT, but since
it's actually TLS records being sent, it's not obvious what the size
would be.
I'm also making an assumption here that tls_read returning
TLS_WANT_POLLOUT is unlikely to happen, since I don't actually set
pollfd.events based on that. I'm not sure how wanting to resume a
tls_read after a POLLOUT could be cleanly handled. I'm just going to
hope that if it does happen, the regular poll loop will eventually sort
it out...
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This needs to be documented! But the documentation won't make any sense
until there's something that can implement the actual functionality of
the capability.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
LibreSSL is "a modified version of that library".
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allows requesting userhost-in-names on freenode, which is available but
hidden.
|
|
|
|
| |
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This addresses pounce getting killed with "Excess flood" when it sends
NAMES commands for too many channels when a client connects. These
commands, as well as automatic AWAY commands, are by default throttled
to 5 per second.
Tested on freenode with 36 channels and 200ms interval.
|
|
|
|
| |
Copied and expanded from catgirl.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Duration is set to INT_MAX since pounce will never accept cleartext
connections.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So the spec doesn't say I can use cap values in CAP REQ. But it also
doesn't explicitly say I can't.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't yet, but it will break the "robustness principle" according
to which a server "SHOULD NOT" assume that a client capable of parsing
one tag is capable of parsing all tags. In future, TagCaps will have all
other caps that use tags ORed into it, and only if the client supports
none of them will tags be filtered out.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I still think this limit is unreasonably large in comparison to 512 for
the actual message.
|